New
Species of Owl Monkey Re-Discovered...30 Years Later Janette Wallis,
ASP Bulletin Editor*
Like many zoo visitors, Roger Brumback’s trip to the San
Diego Zoo earlier this year drew him to the primate exhibits. What
developed after that, however, was unlike any experience shared
by the rest of us. Brumback found himself in front of the owl monkeys
and it reminded him of research he conducted some 30 years ago.
The name of the monkey in San Diego, Aotus nancymai, was not one
he recognized from the past, but he knew it must be associated with
Nancy Shui Fong Ma, a cytogeneticist who had studied Aotus in the
1970s. Brumback now wondered what had become of his own work on
owl monkey genetics. When he returned home, he searched the Internet
and came upon the University of Wisconsin’s Primate Info Net.
As he scanned the current taxonomic classification of owl monkeys,
Brumback was startled to discover details of “Brumback’s
Owl Monkey” (Aotus brumbacki).
Feeling honored and humbled that a species was named for him, Brumback
continued his quest for more information. He learned that, like
many primates, A. brumbacki is threatened by rampant destruction
of its Colombian habitat. It is listed as vulnerable in IUCN’s
2000 Red List (A. Rylands, personal communication). Brumback knew
he had to do something to help; he felt an obligation to save “his”
monkey.
In his search for additional resources, Brumback consulted the
American Society of Primatologists’ web site and sent an email
message to John Capitanio, ASP President-Elect and web site creator.
He told his story in a series of email exchanges with Capitanio,
who then forwarded the story for publication in the ASP Bulletin.
The following is extracted from Brumback’s own words:
“In 1968, during the freshman Spring quarter at the Pennsylvania
State Medical College in Hershey, PA, I was looking for a research
project. I talked with one of the instructors in Anatomy, Dennis
Staton, who was originally trained in geology and had developed
an interest in anthropology and Primatology. Staton and his former
colleague (Neil Todd) from his days at Harvard University had been
using the relatively new technique of chromosome analysis to identify
evolutionary trends in primates. One of the missing data points
in those studies was the karyotype of the South American owl monkey.
Thus, Staton
suggested a project to investigate the karyotype of this animal.
I then discussed the project with Steve Benjamin and Max Lang who
both were supportive. However, I needed to learn the technique of
chromosome analysis (tissue culture, etc.). The person that knew
something about this was John Kreider who showed me the techniques,
and let me use his culture facilities. I studied not only some animals
we purchased at Hershey, but also traveled to Boston and got tissue
and blood samples from a lot of monkeys in the zoo and from a Boston
supplier. Then I spent the next several years collecting the data.
I then cut out and pasted thousands of karytoypes from all these
animals. Finally, I had the results and found what I suspected to
be species differences. Max Lang helped me to prepare a manuscript
and I sent it to Folia Primatologica. In the paper, the statistics
for our analysis were so good that I was sure no one would believe
they were not made up, so I sent all the raw data for reviewers
to see. The paper was accepted immediately and without revision
and, in retrospect, that is remarkable for a first manuscript –
I have never had that happen again.”
Several additional publications resulted from this work. In 1975,
as Brumback’s career turned to new directions, he visited
primatologist Philip Hershkovitz and gave him all the research materials.
Brumback published a letter in the Mammalian Chromosome Newsletter,
stating that he had deposited the materials with Hershkovitz at
the Field Museum, urging others with Aotus specimens to
do the same. At that point, Brumback lost contact with the primatology
community, but his work was not ignored. After examining the deposited
specimens, Hershkovitz confirmed the earlier suspicions and named
one species Aotus brumbacki. According to Hershkovitz,
“The taxonomic revisions proposed by Brumback were not generally
accepted. His urgent appeals to biological investigators for precise
identifications of night monkeys they used in scientific research
went largely unheeded” (p. 210).
The name Hershkovitz is recognized and well-respected by members
of the American Society of Primatologists. In 1991, he received
the Society’s highest honor of being named Distinguished Primatologist.
From an obituary appearing in the Laboratory Primate Newsletter:
“Philip Hershkovitz, 87, died Saturday, February 15,
1997 after a distinguished career. At the time of his death he was
emeritus Curator of Mammals at the Field Museum. He was named Curator
in the Department of Zoology in 1956 after serving as Associate
Curator and having been on staff since 1947. Mr. Hershkovitz retired
in 1971 but continued doing research and writing. He wrote more
than 300 scientific, popular and encyclopedia articles as well as
the classic Living New World Monkeys (Platyrrhini). Mr. Hershkovitz
is credited with finding 75 new species and subspecies of mammals
in South America, including monkeys, marsupials, rodents, and tapir.
About a dozen species have been named for him. His research in 1963
saved hundred of lives in the Amazon region of Bolivia by helping
end an epidemic there of hemorrhagic fever carried by a species
of field mice.”
It is unknown whether Hershkovitz attempted to inform Brumback
about the new
species name. If he did, it may have been difficult in the pre-Internet
world to keep track of
the latter’s whereabouts. Upon completion of his medical training
in Pennsylvania, Brumback
went on to develop his own distinguished career. He accepted appointments
at Washington
University School of Medicine in St. Louis (1975), NIH (to 1977),
University of Pittsburgh (to 1978), University of North Dakota (to
1982), University of Rochester (to 1986), and finally University
of Oklahoma (since 1986). He is now David Ross Boyd Professor and
Interim Chairman of the Department of Pathology in the University
of Oklahoma College of Medicine, specializing in the study of Alzeimer’s
disease.
When John Capitanio forwarded this story for publication in the
Bulletin, I was struck not only by this exciting re-discovery,
but the realization that Brumback was at the same institution
as me. I contacted him immediately to learn more about this
story, recruit him as a new member of ASP, and tell him about the
Society’s conservation activities.
As a self-described “born again conservationist,” Brumback
has recently given the American Society of Primatologists’
Conservation Fund a substantial donation, which will be targeted
for the study and protection of Brumback’s Owl Monkey.
- Janette Wallis, ASP Bulletin Editor.
Selected References
Brumback, R.A. Two distinctive types of owl monkeys (Aotus).
Journal of Medical Primatology 2:284-289, 1973.
Brumback, R.A. Deposition of Aotus specimens, Letter,
Mammalian Chromosome Newsletter, 16:195, 1975.
Brumback, R.A.; Staton, R.D.; Benjamin, S.A. and Lang, C.M. The
chromosomes of Aotus trivirgatus Humboldt
1812. Folia Primatologica 15:264-273, 1971.
Hershkovitz, P. Two new species of night monkeys, genus Aotus
(Cebidae, Platyrrhini): A preliminary report on
Aotus taxonomy. American Journal of Primatology 4:209-243,
1983.
*Originally
published in ASP Bulletin, Vol. 24 No. 2. Reprinted with permission.